The chances of me wearing a Sealander GMT to a nice restaurant are virtually zero, however once I end up buying a twelve I can envisage wearing it to a good restaurant. I certainly see the twelve as more glitzy than the Sealander range, particularly the GMT versions that I very much regard as tool watches. I doubt many owners of the original icons wore them as anything other than as a dressy watch, either socially or at work with a suit. The original concept of the genre was “luxury sports watch” - something to be worn as an alternative to a dress watch and could be worn more widely. I’m looking forward to seeing this in 36mm.ĭrew I think the word dressy means different things to different people. Does anyone else think of it as a dressy watch? To me it reads dressy because of the flash factor. With the latest real world pics, this watch is really growing on me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |